Skip links

Priority indicators for evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs – results of a global modified Delphi study

Priority indicators for evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs - results of a global modified Delphi study

An initial list of evaluation indicators were identified from literature reviews and consultations with impact evaluation experts and FETP professionals.

Paper
Consensus was reached to include 134 evaluation indicators in the final impact evaluation framework. These indicators were grouped as output, outcome, and impact indicators.

We conducted a modified Delphi study to reach consensus on preferred evaluation indicators for FETPs

James A Flint Tambri Housen Martyn D Kirk David N Durrheim

Authors

17 February 2025

Published Online

Abstract

Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETPs) aim to develop a skilled public health workforce through applied competency-based learning. With 98 programs globally and over 20,000 graduates, these programs play a crucial role in disease preparedness and response activities around the world. Despite their importance, there have been few published evaluations. This paper presents the results of a consensus-building process to develop a preferred array of indicators for evaluating the outputs, outcomes, and impacts of FETPs.

Keywords

Delphi method; Field epidemiology training programs; Impact evaluation; Public health workforce; Training indicators.

  • James A Flint,
  • Tambri Housen,
  • Martyn D Kirk,
  • David N Durrheim

© 2025. Crown.

 

Want to receive paper updates?

No worries, we don’t spam your inbox.